Why 73% of Projects Run Late (The Scheduling Mistake You’re Making)

June 20, 2025

 

Sarah stared at her Gantt chart in horror.

Her federal building renovation project was three weeks behind schedule. Again. The painting crew sat idle while waiting for drywall to finish completely. Meanwhile, the concrete team had poured the foundation and vanished for a week – leaving expensive equipment unused.

Sound familiar?

Here’s what most project managers don’t realize: You’re not managing a schedule. You’re managing time itself.

The $2.5 Million Scheduling Mistake

According to PMI’s Pulse of the Profession report, 73% of projects fail to meet their original schedule. In the DC Metro area alone, that translates to roughly $2.5 billion in delayed federal contracts and private sector overruns annually.

The culprit isn’t scope creep or budget cuts.

It’s the way we think about task relationships.

Most project managers default to what I call “waterfall thinking” – everything must be 100% complete before the next task begins. This creates artificial bottlenecks that crush project velocity.

But there’s a better way.

What Are Leads and Lags (Really)?

Forget the textbook definitions for a moment.

Leads are strategic overlaps. They answer: “What can start before this task is completely finished?”

Lags are required waiting periods. They answer: “What must happen during this delay?”

Think of them as time arbitrage opportunities hidden in your schedule.

The Building Renovation Reality Check

Let’s go back to Sarah’s project. Here’s how most project managers would sequence painting and drywall:

  • Week 1-2: Complete all drywall in Building A
  • Week 3: Wait for inspection and cleanup
  • Week 4-5: Begin painting Building A
  • Week 6-7: Complete all drywall in Building B
  • Week 8-9: Paint Building B

Total timeline: 9 weeks

Now watch what happens when we apply leads and lags strategically:

  • Week 1: Start drywall in Room A1
  • Week 2: Continue drywall A1, start drywall A2
  • Week 3: Finish drywall A1, continue A2, start painting A1 (lead relationship)
  • Week 4: Paint A1, finish drywall A2, start drywall B1, start painting A2 (another lead)
  • Week 5: Continue painting A2, drywall B1, start B2
  • Week 6: Paint B1 (using the lead again), finish B2 drywall

New timeline: 6 weeks

That’s a 33% schedule compression without adding resources or working overtime.

The Concrete Curing Goldmine

Here’s where lags become your secret weapon.

Most project managers treat concrete curing time as dead space. The concrete is poured, everyone leaves, and the project sits idle for 72 hours.

But smart project managers ask: “What value-adding work can we do during this mandatory wait?”

  • Install electrical conduits in adjacent areas
  • Deliver and stage materials for the next phase
  • Conduct safety training for the next crew
  • Perform quality inspections on completed work
  • Update project documentation and stakeholder reports

Suddenly, your “lag” becomes productive time instead of schedule drag.

Why Traditional Project Management Training Fails Here

Most project management courses teach leads and lags as mathematical concepts. You learn the formulas. You memorize the relationship types (FS, FF, SS, SF).

But they don’t teach you to see the opportunities.

That’s the difference between knowing project management and mastering it.

In the DC Metro area, where federal contracts and complex infrastructure projects dominate, this skill gap costs millions. A recent study of Department of Defense construction projects found that 68% could have been completed 20-30% faster with proper lead and lag optimization.

The Strategic Questions That Change Everything

Next time you’re building a project schedule, ask these five questions:

1. What can safely start before this task is 100% complete? Look for tasks where 80% completion enables the next activity. Most quality control, for example, can begin when work is 85% done rather than waiting for absolute completion.

2. What must wait, and how can we use that time? Every lag is a hidden resource. Concrete curing, approval cycles, shipping delays – these aren’t project killers if you plan around them.

3. Where are we creating artificial dependencies? Question every “must be complete before” relationship. Many are habits, not requirements.

4. What parallel work streams make sense? Complex projects often have multiple work streams that can run simultaneously with proper lead relationships.

5. How do we maintain quality while optimizing speed? Speed without quality is just expensive rework. The best leads maintain or improve quality by allowing more time for each task.

Real-World Application: Federal IT Implementation

Consider a typical federal IT system implementation in the DC area:

Traditional approach:

  • Complete requirements gathering (4 weeks)
  • Complete system design (6 weeks)
  • Complete development (12 weeks)
  • Complete testing (4 weeks)
  • Deploy (2 weeks)

Total: 28 weeks

Optimized with leads and lags:

  • Requirements gathering (4 weeks)
  • System design begins at week 3 (1-week lead)
  • Development begins at week 8 (2-week lead from design)
  • Testing begins at week 16 (4-week lead from development)
  • Deployment preparation during testing lag time

New total: 22 weeks

The 6-week savings often means the difference between making fiscal year deadlines and losing budget approval.

The PMP Certification Advantage

Here’s what separates PMP-certified project managers from the rest: We understand that project management is about optimizing constraints, not just following processes.

The PMP curriculum specifically covers leads and lags as part of schedule optimization. But more importantly, PMP training teaches you to think systemically about project relationships.

When you understand concepts like:

  • Critical path analysis
  • Resource leveling
  • Schedule compression techniques
  • Risk management integration

You start seeing opportunities everywhere.

Common Leads and Lags Mistakes (And How to Avoid Them)

Mistake #1: Using leads without quality gates Just because you can start early doesn’t mean you should. Build in quality checkpoints to prevent rework.

Mistake #2: Ignoring resource conflicts A lead relationship is only valuable if you have the resources to execute it. Don’t create impossible resource demands.

Mistake #3: Forgetting about lag opportunities Every mandatory delay is a chance to add value elsewhere. Don’t waste lag time.

Mistake #4: Over-complicating the schedule Complex lead and lag relationships can make schedules hard to manage. Keep it as simple as possible while maximizing value.

Mistake #5: Not communicating the strategy Your team needs to understand why tasks are overlapping or why there are planned delays. Communication prevents confusion.

Implementation Framework for DC Metro Project Managers

Phase 1: Schedule Analysis (Week 1)

  • Review current project schedules
  • Identify all finish-to-start relationships
  • Question each dependency’s necessity
  • Map potential lead opportunities

Phase 2: Pilot Implementation (Weeks 2-4)

  • Select 2-3 low-risk lead opportunities
  • Plan lag time utilization
  • Brief team on new approach
  • Monitor results closely

Phase 3: Optimization (Weeks 5-8)

  • Expand successful lead relationships
  • Eliminate ineffective ones
  • Develop standard operating procedures
  • Train team members on new methods

Phase 4: Mastery (Ongoing)

  • Make leads and lags part of standard planning
  • Continuously look for new opportunities
  • Share lessons learned across projects
  • Mentor other project managers

The Career Impact Nobody Talks About

Project managers who master schedule optimization earn 31% more than those who don’t, according to recent PMI salary data. In the DC Metro market, where the median PMP salary is $128,000, that’s an extra $40,000 annually.

More importantly, you become the project manager leadership calls when schedules matter. Those high-visibility, career-making projects.

Beyond Leads and Lags: The Bigger Picture

Understanding leads and lags is really about understanding project flow. When you optimize task relationships, you’re developing skills that transfer to:

  • Resource management
  • Risk mitigation
  • Stakeholder communication
  • Team leadership
  • Strategic thinking

These are the competencies that separate project coordinators from project leaders.

Taking Action in Your Next Project

Start small. Pick your current project and identify:

  1. One obvious lead opportunity – Where can work begin before a predecessor is 100% complete?
  2. One underutilized lag – Where is there mandatory wait time you could use productively?
  3. One artificial dependency – Where are you waiting unnecessarily?

Implement these three changes and measure the results. You’ll likely see immediate schedule improvements.

Then gradually expand your thinking to see more opportunities.

The Path Forward

Schedule optimization through leads and lags isn’t just a project management technique. It’s a mindset shift from linear thinking to systems thinking.

In the competitive DC Metro project management market, this mindset separates the good from the great.

Whether you’re managing federal IT implementations, commercial construction, or organizational change initiatives, the principle remains: The best schedule isn’t always the most obvious one.


Ready to master advanced project management techniques like leads and lags optimization?

The concepts covered here are just the beginning. Professional project management training – especially PMP certification – provides the comprehensive foundation you need to consistently deliver projects faster, better, and with less stress.

Curious how proper project management training could accelerate your career in the DC Metro area? Let’s talk about your specific situation and goals.


Internal Linking Opportunities:

  • “PMP Certification Benefits for DC Metro Professionals”
  • “Critical Path Method vs. Agile: Which Works Better for Federal Contracts?”
  • “Resource Leveling Techniques for Government Project Managers”
  • “Schedule Compression Without Scope Creep: A DC Case Study”
  • “Why 85% of Prince George’s County Infrastructure Projects Finish Late”