In the fast-paced world of digital agency ownership, relying solely on gut instincts and quick decisions may not suffice. While there’s merit to quick action, calculated, data-driven decisions bring extreme value to the table. Today, we’re diving deep into one such critical decision: should you onboard a Senior Project Manager as a Full-Time Employee (FTE) or opt for a Fractional Project Manager (FPM)? We’ll dissect the costs, effectiveness, and associated risks, providing you with a no-nonsense guide to making an informed choice.
(Note: For the purposes of this article, we’ll use the term ‘fractional’ as synonymous with freelance and contract project managers.)
You may find your project management team is rapidly reaching its capacity, or perhaps you’ve lost a key project manager unexpectedly. The need for quick, competent reinforcements is critical to prevent team burnout and project derailment.
The pivotal question remains: Which route offers the most value to your agency—FTE or FPM?
We won’t claim to cover every variable at play, but we will offer a comprehensive cost analysis grounded in industry-specific data.
Let’s begin by focusing solely on senior-level project managers, diving into the financial nuances associated with bringing them into your fold. Whether it’s Full-Time Employment (FTE) or Fractional Project Management (FPM), each comes with its own set of costs—both hard and soft.
When it comes to FTEs, Senior Project Managers command annual salaries ranging from $120,000 to $140,000. In the agency space, these figures lean more toward the lower end, especially in smaller firms. For this exercise, let’s employ a conservative estimate of $120,000.
Beyond the base salary, other expenditures include:
Expense Type | Cost | Calculation | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Salary | $120,000 | $120,000 | |
Benefits | 31% of Salary | $120,000 * 0.31 | $37,200 |
Recruitment Costs | $18,000 | 15% of Salary | $18,000 |
Taxes* | $9,222 | $9,222 | |
Total Costs | $184,422 |
*Taxes are calculated for an employee hired in Pennsylvania and do not include SUI or local PA taxes.
Ignoring soft costs is a grave oversight. These hidden costs can significantly impact your bottom line.
They encompass factors such as:
Expense Type | Cost | Calculation | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Onboarding | $4,700 | $4,700 | |
Training | $4,120 | 40 hours*$103 | $4,120 |
Software Licenses | $300 | $300 | |
Total Costs | 9,120 |
Adding it all up we get:
Expense Type | Cost | Calculation | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Salary | $120,000 | $120,000 | |
Benefits | 30% of Salary | $120,000 * 0.31 | $37,200 |
Recruitment Costs | $18,000 | 15% of Salary | $18,000 |
Taxes* | $9,222 | $9,222 | |
Onboarding | $4,700 | $4,700 | |
Training | $4,120 | 40 hours*$103 | $4,120 |
Software Licenses | $300 | $300 | |
Total Costs | $193,542 |
Be aware that these numbers can vary based on how you acquire talent. The bottom line: talent isn’t cheap. An FTE will require at least a six-month runway to start delivering a return on your substantial investment.
Let’s shift gears and examine the costs involved when hiring a Fractional Project Manager (FPM). A thorough understanding of these expenses—both hard and soft—is crucial for accurate budgeting and effective decision-making.
Not unlike Full-Time Employees (FTEs), Fractional Project Managers (FPMs) also have their financial implications, both direct and indirect. These costs can make or break your budget, making it essential for digital agency owners to fully understand them before making a hiring decision.
Cost Type | Description | Cost Estimate |
---|---|---|
Hourly Rate | Most Direct Cost | $60-$110p/h |
Equipment | Necessary Tools | $10-$30/month |
Onboarding | Initial Setup | $200-$300 |
While hard costs are straightforward to quantify, soft costs are less transparent but equally impactful. These are the financial elements that most don’t take into consideration.
Cost Type | Description | Cost Estimate |
---|---|---|
Time for Integration | Time required for team integration | $250 |
Communication Overheads | Time spent on internal communication | $60/week |
For a detailed financial blueprint, let’s calculate the average total cost for an FPM based on a median hourly rate of $85, within the range of $60-$110 per hour. The FPM in this scenario is working 20 hours a week, yielding an 80-hour work month for your agency.
Expense Category | Description | On-Time Cost | Cost/Hour or Monthly | Total Monthly Cost ($) | Breakdown | Aggregate Hourly Rate ($/hr) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hourly Rate | Most Direct Cost | — | $85/hr | 6,800 | 80 hours x $85/hr | |
Tools | Necessary Tools | — | $30/month | 30 | $30/month | |
Onboarding | Initial Setup | $250 (average) | — | 250 | One-time | |
Time for Integration | Team Integration | $250 | — | 250 | One-time | |
Communication Overheads | Internal Communication | — | $60/week | 240 | 4 weeks x $60/week | |
Total On-Time Cost | $500 | Sum of on-time costs | ||||
Total Monthly Cost | — | — | 7,070 | Sum of all expenses | $88.38 |
The aggregate hourly rate stands at $88.38 when you account for both one-time and recurring costs over an 80-hour work month. This refined calculation gives you a more complete financial perspective, further informing your decision
At this stage, let’s get granular for financial planning: the Cost Per Hour (CPH). This metric gives us a normalized basis for comparing Full-Time Employees (FTEs) and Fractional Project Managers (FPMs), ultimately helping you make a more informed decision.
The FTE route might appear daunting when one looks at the annual cost, but understanding it on an hourly basis can offer new perspectives. Let’s break it down:
Using the standard 2080 hours (calculated as 40 hours per week multiplied by 52 weeks) as the average working hours in a year, the CPH for an FTE is calculated as:
CPH = $193,542/2080
CPH = $93.04
For the FPM, the calculation is straightforward given that we already have the aggregate hourly rate. This rate—$88.38—already includes any additional monthly expenses and falls within the industry standard range of $60 to $110, depending on variables like experience and project scope of course.
CPH = $88.38
FTE | FPM | |
---|---|---|
Cost Per Hour | $93.04 | $88.38 |
Now, instead of juggling abstract numbers, we have specific, concrete data points. Let’s run these numbers in a few scenarios.
Now that we know what each resource will cost per hour let’s walk through a few scenarios on when it would make sense, financially or logically to hire an FTE or engage a FPM.
You have a web development project that is halfway through completion, with 6 months left in duration. This project is going off the rails and if it’s not pulled in tight it will not deliver value and you will suffer financial loss. You need a sharp, targeted intervention.
While it’s tempting to consider an FTE, their onboarding time and cost often outweigh their benefits in a time-critical situation. An in-house project manager might be another option, but their effectiveness would depend on factors beyond just availability and capacity.
To illustrate the financial aspect, consider the following. You have 95 hours remaining in your project management budget:
Metrics | Full-Time Employee (FTE) | Freelance Project Manager (FPM) |
---|---|---|
Hourly Rate | $93.04/hr | $88.38/hr |
Total Hours | 95 hours | 95 hours |
Total Cost | $8,838.80 | $8,396.10 |
Billable Rate | $185/hr | $185/hr |
Total Revenue | $17,575 | $17,575 |
Total ROI | $8,736.20 | $9,178.90 |
Profit Margin | 49.7% | 52.2% |
In this case the FPM is more cost effective and yields a 2.5% higher margin. But other reasons to opt for the FPM are:
You’ve just secured a high-value client looking for a comprehensive multi-channel marketing strategy to be executed within the next quarter. This isn’t merely about digital strategy; the project involves complex layers such as rebranding, UX/UI enhancements, and possibly even website maintenance. Based on your estimates, you’ll need approximately 250 hours dedicated to project management, allocating 4 hours a day over a 3-month span.
To make an informed decision about which resource is optimal, let’s look into the financials.
Metrics | Full-Time Employee (FTE) | Freelance Project Manager (FPM) |
---|---|---|
Hourly Rate | $93.04/hr | $88.38/hr |
Total Hours | 250 hours | 250 hours |
Total Cost | $23,260 | $22,095 |
Billable Rate | $185/hr | $185/hr |
Total Revenue | $46,250 | $46,250 |
Total ROI | $22,990 | $24,155 |
Profit Margin | 49.7% | 52.2% |
As we determined in the first scenario the FPM will always turn a higher profit in these scenarios. However, that doesn’t mean it’s the right choice. Here are compelling reasons to opt for an FTE in this context:
You’ve just landed a significant client who’s interested in a long-term contract involving multi-channel digital marketing campaigns, web development, and potentially app development. The project is estimated to span 18 months, and there are clear deliverables for the first 6 months but only general goals and key performance indicators (KPIs) for the subsequent 12 months. The contract is a big win, but it puts your existing project management capacity under stress.
Reasons to Opt for a Full-Time Employee (FTE) Project Manager
Deciding between a Full-Time Employee (FTE) and a Fractional Project Manager (FPM) goes beyond simple calculations, although the numbers start the conversation. As we’ve seen, both options have their merits depending on the situation, and those merits extend past the balance sheet and into strategic planning, risk mitigation, and client relations.
What’s the smart play then? If you’re looking for a quick, expertise-driven solution and have a well-defined problem space—FPM is the way to go. If you’re thinking long-term, building client relationships, and fortifying your internal capabilities are high on your list—opt for an FTE.
By systematically examining the pros and cons in different scenarios, you not only make a smarter choice but also set up a framework for future decision-making. These are not just numbers or “either-or” situations; these are strategic decisions that should align with your business goals, client expectations, and team dynamics.
As the landscape of project management evolves, it’s crucial to approach these decisions with a keen eye for detail, strategic foresight, and an understanding that some benefits—be they cost savings or long-term gains—aren’t immediately visible on a spreadsheet. Make your choice not just as a function of cost, but as an investment in your future capabilities and relationships. That’s not just good project management; that’s exceptional business acumen.